Does the racial prejudice many of our elected officials still harbor - especially the old, the white, and the southern, color their view of marijuana and marijuana users?

Harvard Looks at
Medical Marijuana
Medical marijuana is usually used for pain control. While marijuana isn’t strong enough for severe pain (e.g. after surgery), it is quite effective for the chronic pain that plagues millions of Americans, especially as they get older.

Read the Story

James Monroe enjoyed hashish?

Our fifth President openly smoked hashish throughout his time as the US Ambassador to France and continued to do so pretty regularly until he passed away.

Read the Story

No changes at CA Border
Although California legalized marijuana for recreational use, federal agents will continue to seize the innocuous herb - no matter how small an amount - on the state's busy freeways and country roads.

Read the Story

Why the fuss?

As documented elsewhere within this website, every single federal law ever enacted in the United States having to do with marijuana was passed without the benefit of any supporting scientific facts or research, rational reason or justification, or resulting benefit to our great nation. Contrarily and sadly, these laws have been passed in direct contradiction of government sponsored reports and commissions as well as pleas from our nation's most brilliant medical minds and civic leaders. In other words, our lawmakers have a documented history of acting in accordance with the very definition of irrational behavior:
    Collins:
    not based on logical reasons or clear thinking.

    Miriam-Webster:
  1. not endowed with reason or understanding
  2. lacking usual or normal mental clarity or coherence;
    not governed by or according to reason

So, the question, is, "why?". Why the fuss? Why go to all this trouble worrying about an obviously innocuous substance that literally grows like a weed? And why keep it up for over a hundred years, in the face of better technology and better science and better and better indications that it is indeed innocuous?

If you try to come up with a reason you may drive yourself a little nutty until you realize that it is foolhardy to try to explain irrational behavior with rational thought. Irrational behavior is the result of irrational thought - always. So all bets are off, because people defending irrational behavior will never ever cop to the fact that it is irrational. We'll never really know what drives these guys - chances are they don't know either. The best we can do is take a couple guesses.

Guess One
the bible clearly states the plant called hemp is proper for Christians to use for food, medicine, and enjoyment (Gen. 1:12).2 In Genesis 1:29–31, the Bible further indicates that all herbs are given for food.
The first and most obvious guess is that fear of marijuana - especially when lumped in with other much more dangerous drugs - is taught in the home in the same way racial prejudice is taught in the home. These inherited beliefs and values, like choice of religion, are usually pretty-well engrained by puberty, and somewhere between difficult and impossible to unseat. They don't have to be logical or justifiable because they just are. We all have these.

Guess Two
The second guess is a twist on the first. I am just supposing here, and I am not (necessarily) pointing a finger at any one person.

Does the racial prejudice many of our elected officials still harbor - especially the old, the white, and the southern, color their view of marijuana and marijuana users? I am white. To me, pot is a white person's pleasure. Soccer moms and hunting rednecks and divorce lawyers and school teachers get high in my world. I have certainly and many times gotten high with black friends, but becuase of where I live, my world is mostly white and so are the marijuana users in it. I wonder if these old white politicians, bitter because they never got elected President or sat on the Supreme Court, many from the south, and all completely out of touch with what life is really like in these United States, view marijuana as an inner-city issue. I wonder what shade of skin they envision marijuana users having. And then I wonder if the racial prejudice many of our elected officials still harbor - especially the old, the white, and the southern, colors their view (pun intended) of marijuana and marijuana users.

Of course prejudice is irrational, and so any thought that stems from it will be inherently irrational. America is apparently still a nation of racists, currently led by a racist President. Some of us silly, naïve people thought that the 60s and 70s had actually made a difference, but it more often than not seems worse now than it was then. At least in the 70s people talked about racial inequality instead of deciding it is unPC because it is an uncomfortable topic. So my supposition makes sense to me. I could be wrong.

Best Guess
Lastly, In 1949, H. L. Mencken identified in Americans "the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy." This has sometimes been interpreted as an insightful articulation of our odd, perhaps Puritanical need to criminalize other people's inclination to catch a buzz. Or in other words, people don't want other people to have fun that they aren't having.

It is easy to see how a parent, teacher or politician - as the one in charge, and separate by default and definition - can feel left out when everyone else is having fun, and they have to be cool. It is easy to picture a cartoon starring almost any politician from almost any era, talking to a cohort, with a text cloud above his head that reads: "Why should they get to get high? Did they ever invite me, just once? No! They think I'm an old fuddy-duddy? Fine! Screw ‘em. Pass a new law tomorrow. Damn kids." Maybe if someone had been able to get Nixon high we wouldn't be on this path!

So, as the most logical irrational answer to the question, "Why the fuss?", we hereby conclude and submit: Our leaders simply don't want us to have any fun that they're not having. That's it!

We all hope and pray that someday very soon (tomorrow would be great) we'll get someone in charge at the federal level that realizes how many millions (maybe billions) of tax dollars they are not collecting, and be big enough to either let us have some fun that they’re not having, or join us. We are bipartisan and we share!


Home      Driving      Working      Dependence      Youngsters      Typecast      Contact      Text Version
All written content within this website © 2018   All rights reserved. Duplication is prohibitied.

All images on this website have either been listed as being in Public Domain, specifically licensed for reuse, used with permission or credited.
If any image on this website does not fit into one of those categories, please contact our right away.

By linking to stories and/or pages on other websites, we are not necessarily endorsing that entity's products, views or web content. Links are provided to give easy access to relevant articles for our readers' convenience and only for that purpose.

For opinions, rants and occasional wisdom click to reeno317.me